Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 21st Jul 2012 23:06 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 528019
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/15/13 23:03 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-08-18
TBH all that matters to a user that it works as advertised aka to requirements. The development team is the only people that should be worried about code quality as bad code costs the business development time.
It is also rather trivial to see how a program works (profiling, tools such as wireshack, to how a program is working behind the scenes).
[q]How would you measure code quality if you don't have an access to the source? DO you want to judge upon such factors as "stability"? Well, this can be accomplished by using dirty hacks, tricks inside the code.
I don't have to measure code quality, I am the user not the development team.
I might be a user but I do not believe in an extreme philosophy that all code my be open and one cannot judge quality unless we can see the complete source code.
You said it was crap code and they will be sued and a lot of other nonsense.
You are taking things to an extreme, it doesn't help anyone. Sorry what you have is a belief.
I will keep on saying it, open source isn't magical bullet. It works for some projects and companies ... others it would kill their business model.