Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 23rd Jul 2012 20:17 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 528073
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-11-22
Granted it's been a while but I recall how things were when I started. It was a mix of competing protocols, standards and technologies for a long time. Just a few I recall off the top of my head are:
lower layers:
10base2
10baseT
ethernetII
802.3 (ethernet)
decnet
token ring (can't recall the wiring spec name but I think they had both 4 AND 16 mbps options)
netbuei
sna
higher layer:
netbios
ipx/spx
tcp/ip
sna
ANY one or two of the technologies listed could have never existed and I'm pretty sure we would still have something like the internet today. It might have taken longer but in the end it seems a logical evolution of networking.
I should point out I was rather late in the game too (started working in networking in 88 as I recall). The author seems quite poorly informed about this subject. Maybe he should have talked to some of the people that were working on things back then.