Linked by henderson101 on Tue 24th Jul 2012 23:42 UTC
Google "I read earlier this week about a developer who made their Android version free after the $1 game was extensively pirated. Stories like this come as no surprise, but the industry press rarely deals with the core problem - and nor does Google. [...] Whilst the aforementioned story about the Android game didn't surprise me, it did horrify me. Android is designed to be difficult to make money from, and the core issue is that it's open - with the corrosive mentality that surrounds such openness."
Thread beginning with comment 528169
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Comment - just say'n
by jabbotts on Wed 25th Jul 2012 19:12 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Comment"
Member since:

'they are assholes for infringing copyright on $1 software programs but I'm ok because I only infringe copyright on $1 music tracks.'

hm.... Not a judgement on your copying music, just questioning why the distinction given the equal pricing.

Reply Parent Score: 4

RE[4]: Comment - just say'n
by pandronic on Thu 26th Jul 2012 05:28 in reply to "RE[3]: Comment - just say'n"
pandronic Member since:

I don't know, maybe I'm also an asshole by somebody else's standards. I just make a distinction on whether you can afford the things you pirate or not ... In my book, if you can afford them and you still pirate them, then you're an asshole.

Reply Parent Score: 1