Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 25th Jul 2012 22:23 UTC, submitted by fran
Legal Samsung's filings in one of the cases with Apple (I lost track because I have a life) are actually pretty cool. "Samsung has been researching and developing mobile telecommunications technology since at least as early as 1991 and invented much of the technology for today's smartphones. Indeed, Apple, which sold its first iPhone nearly twenty years after Samsung started developing mobile phone technology, could not have sold a single iPhone without the benefit of Samsung's patented technology." Another gem: "Contrary to the image it has cultivated in the popular press, Apple has admitted in internal documents that its strength is not in developing new technologies first, but in successfully commercializing them."
Thread beginning with comment 528343
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Another perspective
by flypig on Thu 26th Jul 2012 13:18 UTC in reply to "Another perspective"
flypig
Member since:
2005-07-13

In 2011, Samsung’s own Product Design Group noted that it is “regrettable” that the Galaxy S “looks similar” to older iPhone models.


All of this may be true, and for a design patent it's certainly relevant. However, it also serves to highlight the problem. Personally I don't want progress in technology to be held back by the the danger of products looking similar.

If someone might have mistaken a Galaxy for an iPhone then this is certainly a problem of false representation. But if two products look similar but clearly distinguishable, do we really want this to be enough reason to create a state-enforced monopoly?

Reply Parent Score: 7