Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 25th Jul 2012 22:18 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 528362
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-10
Folders are just not that complex. I used to be the fixit guy for most of my friends and family who are not all that computer literate. They all use folders.
A point I often make is that there is often very little need for deep folder hierarchies as far as the user is concerned. And that is the behavior I see for most regular PC users. They simply don't have the data needed for really deep hierarchies.
Pictures\myvacation - one level deep
Projects\2010\class\projectname - three levels deep
It rarely gets more complicated than that for the average user.
I applaud all these operating systems for throwing in some default folders (pictures, music, documents...) because it gives most users a starting point at least.
The problem with folders comes in maintaining them. People get lazy and don't want to create a folder. I do it all the time. I'd rather the OS make some effort to help you keep it organized. Suppose I just copy a bunch of pictures to my Picture directory. Perhaps that would be a nice way for the file manager to ask 'Do you wish to play these in a new folder?' I know a popup dialog would be annoying, so I'm not suggesting that
I remember with Vista and they supposed database file system, I thought to myself... what is the demand here? I get the theoretical vision, but I didn't see how it would play out. For real server work.... people already use real data bases. For things people have a lot of (pictures, music...) people already have dedicated index/search players.
It really is trying to solve a problem that doesn't exist.
I think its better to keep folders, enhance it with search and help auto-organize.