Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 27th Jul 2012 12:41 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 528493
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Yes, but possible Gnome was already understaffed to pull through both efforts (desktop and mobile designs). Or they considered it not important. KDE made that distinction clear from the start (i.e. Plasma for desktop and PlasmaActive for mobile). Unfortunately for Gnome, ignoring that distinction is a bad idea.
Edited 2012-07-27 22:36 UTC
I think the underlying toolkit (Qt) helped enormously in this case. TrollTech and later Nokia were already adding support for declaratively defined touch interfaces via Qt Quick.
KDE could quickly leverage Quick for touch interfaces, and there already is a sort of separation in the Qt toolkit between the old Qt (desktop) widgets and Qt Quick.





Member since:
2005-07-06
Gnome 3 should have been the tablet gui version of Gnome, ala what kde did.