Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 25th Jul 2012 22:18 UTC
OSNews, Generic OSes The article I'm about to link to, by Oliver Reichenstein, is pretty terrible, but it's a good way for me to bring up something I've been meaning to talk about. First, the article: "Apple has been working on its file system and with iOS it had almost killed the concept of folders - before reintroducing them with a peculiar restriction: only one level! With Mountain Lion it brings its one folder level logic to OSX. What could be the reason for such a restrictive measure?" So, where does this crusade against directory structures (not file systems, as the article aggravatingly keeps stating) come from?
Thread beginning with comment 528622
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: To the point
by siride on Sat 28th Jul 2012 05:15 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: To the point"
Member since:

What if that's not how I want to organize my music?

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[5]: To the point
by cjcoats on Sun 29th Jul 2012 19:53 in reply to "RE[4]: To the point"
cjcoats Member since:


I'm a ballroom dancer, and I usually want to organize by dance-category (slow waltz, foxtrot, tango, quickstep Viennese waltz). Then by other things (exact tempo, etc.)...

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[6]: To the point
by zima on Mon 30th Jul 2012 16:06 in reply to "RE[5]: To the point"
zima Member since:

You know, that works with ID3 (and such) tags, too ...probably more swift, even. And with added benefit category "branches" being non-exclusive.

Reply Parent Score: 2