Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 27th Jul 2012 12:41 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 528656
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Personal views on the matter of Gnome 3
by WereCatf on Sat 28th Jul 2012 15:42
in reply to "RE[2]: Personal views on the matter of Gnome 3"
No it isn't. After several years it's become pretty stable now
I don't know why, but I still keep having Plasma crash on me every time I use KDE for more than 10 minutes. Granted, I have only tried KDE with Kubuntu on two different VMware machines, but I don't know if that really makes any difference.
RE[4]: Personal views on the matter of Gnome 3
by boudewijn on Sat 28th Jul 2012 16:06
in reply to "RE[3]: Personal views on the matter of Gnome 3"
I really wonder what you are doing then... There must be something rather particular that you _always_ do within ten minutes that causes a crash. I wonder if it would be possible for you to make a video of your first ten minutes until the crash so we can try to figure out what that particular action that most other people don't execute is.
RE[4]: Personal views on the matter of Gnome 3
by segedunum on Mon 30th Jul 2012 08:37
in reply to "RE[3]: Personal views on the matter of Gnome 3"
I don't know why, but I still keep having Plasma crash on me every time I use KDE for more than 10 minutes.
Well, video drivers are finicky things and apparently they are in Gnome 3, but, ever since about 4.2 or 4.3 I've been able to use KDE and openSUSE quite happily for 8 hours every day for work. I have quite a few 'Plasmoids' installed and do quite a bit of file management and sys admin work. I don't think it gets much more intensive than that.
I've had openSUSE's silly applet updater crash a few times, but that's about it.
RE[3]: Personal views on the matter of Gnome 3
by ple_mono on Sat 28th Jul 2012 21:58
in reply to "RE[2]: Personal views on the matter of Gnome 3"
No it isn't. After several years it's become pretty stable now and has allowed KDE to do an awful lot more than could ever have been possible with the old Kicker - or whatever the core of the desktop actually was back then. It's your view against mine.
Well, maybe i worded that badly."buggy as hell" isn't quite true, but if there's any component of the KDE desktop i feel bugs out more often than the rest of the DE, then plasma is it. Misplaced widgets, missing redraw/resize and such for the most part.
I have no idea what that means. What designs?
Sorry about that. I meant that a majority of KDE applications, seeming to primarily be developed with the oxygen engine/style in mind, rather than staying "style-agnostic" if you will.
RE[4]: Personal views on the matter of Gnome 3
by cdude on Sun 29th Jul 2012 02:38
in reply to "RE[3]: Personal views on the matter of Gnome 3"





Member since:
2005-07-06
No it isn't. After several years it's become pretty stable now and has allowed KDE to do an awful lot more than could ever have been possible with the old Kicker - or whatever the core of the desktop actually was back then. It's your view against mine.
I have no idea what that means. What designs?