To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
You're own article Thom; http://www.osnews.com/story/25174/Samsung_Launches_Offensive_Agains...
They both are offensive patent trolls.
I really get the impression as of late, that when it's an Apple vs. Samsung/Android article, you take the Samsung/Android side. Where's the article about Samsung (possibly) quite knowingly copied Apple's iPhone? Quite some other site's have those; http://allthingsd.com/20120725/apple-google-warned-samsung-against-...
(PS; I'm an Apple and Linux sysadmin, love Apple for the desktop and the user experience somewhat more. Just don't like android for what it is and the experience that it gives me).
Well, here you see how patents work. If someone attacks you with there patents you can only defend using your patents by attacking yourself. That is offensive vs defensive as Thom wrote and there is indeed a HUGE difference.
It is Apple attacking there and there are no question about that. They where the ones that tried and still try to fight compitors competing on the market against there products using there patents. They started the patent war. That Samsung defends themself using the same tactick is just the consequence.
Now there are 2 options left:
1. Escalade the war. That is what happens.
2. Come to and end and compete again. That is in Samsungs best interest cause, as we see, they are winning on the market. But its not in Apples best interest.
Sooner or later 2 will happen cause 1 reached its peak and from there, once everybody used all there weapons, its done and things can move on.
Edited 2012-07-29 05:14 UTC
You mean Apple is trying to defend itself against IP theft? "
No. Android is not a copy of iOS, there is not one line of code in common.
Apple is trying to destroy Android, and also eliminate all serious competition.
It is attempting to do so by arguing that Motorola or Samsung should get only $0.0049 (half a cent) per device for essential, expensive R&D hardware patents that make up the actual working core of a mobile phone (and then not paying out even that much), yet Apple should get from Motorola and Samsung $24 per device for a rectangular-box-with-rounded-corners cosmetic "design" which it stole from Sony anyway.
http://www.muktware.com/4029/apple-stole-iphone-design-sony-patente...
http://www.muktware.com/sites/default/files/images/applications/son...
So who exactly is the IP thief? I'll give you a hint ... it isn't Motorola or Samsung.
Edited 2012-07-29 10:20 UTC





Member since:
2005-06-29
Defensive vs. offensive. There's a difference.