Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 28th Jul 2012 10:10 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 528680
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: History will repeat itself...
by Bill Shooter of Bul on Sat 28th Jul 2012 17:06
in reply to "RE[2]: History will repeat itself..."
RE[3]: History will repeat itself...
by moondevil on Sat 28th Jul 2012 17:22
in reply to "RE[2]: History will repeat itself..."




Member since:
2011-05-19
But Microsoft had a monopoly in the Windows era. They could be open because they defined the terms of the competition in that way -- compatibility with the widest array of applications. Remember: developers, developers, developers.
Windows Mobile was an open system, as well. You could do anything you wanted with it -- you could install apps simply by downloading a .CAB, edit the registry, etc.
By being slow with Windows Phone, Microsoft allowed Android to become the second entrant. Thus, Microsoft went from first entrant to third entrant. As third entrant, it now faced a radically different competitive situation. Either it could compete against free, or it could compete against Apple. Guess which one they decided would be more profitable.