Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 30th Jul 2012 19:38 UTC, submitted by tupp
Thread beginning with comment 529010
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Sony eh. Very interesting read.
by vruz on Fri 3rd Aug 2012 17:03
in reply to "RE: Sony eh. Very interesting read."
+1 on all counts.
additionally, in **1870** this little genius said:
"Plagiarism is necessary. Progress implies it. It holds tight an author’s phrase, uses his expressions, eliminates a false idea, and replaces it with just the right idea."
– Isidore Ducasse, Comte de Lautréamont, Poésies II




Member since:
2012-07-31
As I'm pretty fed up with the Jobsian religion and its tireless acolytes, I've just registered to vent my rage. I would like to make a few points (I thought they were platitudes, but it seems I was wrong):
1. Steve Jobs was not an artist of any kind; no Apple product is a work of art by any "artistic" standards (more of a sexual fetish or a religious totem).
2. "Good artists copy, great artists steal" is not an original quote by Jobs, but by Pablo Picasso; similarly T.S. Eliot had already remarked that "Immature poets imitate; mature poets steal" (perhaps Picasso stole the quote, by he was a great artist after all).
3. Apart from quotations, Jobs and Apple stole many of their "new" concepts and designs.
4. If you aren't a great artist -- not even a good artist or an immature one (see point 1) -- and you steal nevertheless (see points 2 & 3) then you are a thief. (Mind you, this does not mean that other companies are not thieves too.)