To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
http://flowingdata.com/2011/08/22/mobile-patent-lawsuits-2/
From the chart you posted I dont see Google suing anyone.
andydread,
"From the chart you posted I dont see Google suing anyone."
Yep, it's humorous that the poster would say something that disagrees with the evidence he provided, but he probably meant to illustrate the chaos rather than make a literal statement.
Arguably google entered the game so late that it lacks the portfolio needed to mount a successful attack, but I won't read into it that way - they appear to genuinely believe that it is wrong to use patents offensively.
A piece of information that is missing on the chart is timeframe, and whether lawsuits were filed in response to an attack from the other party. That might show a much better view of who the aggressors and defenders are. We already know where apple lies, but some of the other companies I'm not so sure.
Edited 2012-07-31 16:03 UTC
Although Google effectively now owns Motorola, and it was Motorola's patents that were part of the motivation for Google's purchase: http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2012/07/24/google-says-patents-tech-wer...
http://flowingdata.com/2011/08/22/mobile-patent-lawsuits-2/
Google only just started counter-suing through Motorola and only to try to force those attacking Android to enter a cross-license agreement, which short of a patent reform seems to be the only way to stop the madness.





Member since:
2012-07-31
Agreed, but can you name a company that isn't using patents in the same way as Apple? This year-old chart seems to suggest that they're all at it!
http://flowingdata.com/2011/08/22/mobile-patent-lawsuits-2/