Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 30th Jul 2012 19:38 UTC, submitted by tupp
Thread beginning with comment 529113
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Did Xerox actually have many commercial sales? As I remember it was a flop. May be "first commercially successful" would be accurate?
Shifting the goalpasts. Apple fans' favourite pasttime. Oh, so Apple didn't invent it? So what, they were the first to be commercially successful with it! Oh, they weren't the first to be commercially successful? Well, they were the first to do it right!
So predictable.
Shifting the goalpasts. Apple fans' favourite pasttime.
And you don't ever shift goal posts? So, this entire tirade is based on evidence the court struck off. Want to print a retraction? No, didn't think so. Because you're happy to believe what you're spoon feed by Samsung's legal team.
Oh, so Apple didn't invent it? So what, they were the first to be commercially successful with it!
Please provide a citation that disproves that fact. Whilst you're at it, please verify the context that the original correction came from. I suggested that the OP was thinking of "popular" or "consumer" level sales. Have you ever seen a Xerox Star outside of a museum? Have you ever seen a Mac outside of a museum? I rest my case.
Oh, they weren't the first to be commercially successful? Well, they were the first to do it right!
So predictable.
So predictable.
"*Mutter* *mutter* you damn kids GET OF MY LAWN!" Where should I mail you your pipe and slippers?
"When you really break it down, Apple only developed the original Mac OS, "
"Wrong. Or is the Mac OS X on my Mac Mini Scotch Mist?"
I have no doubt that Apple would have preferred to use the Linux kernel for OS X but took FreeBSD as their liberal licence allowed Apple to take all their hard work and give nothing back. They made a pretty interface with many fans but can't take credit for the underlying OS.
Oh yeah, as Thom says, you are guilty of trying to move the goalposts on the original argument on the first GUI... at least try to be objective.
... OS X but took FreeBSD as their liberal licence allowed Apple to take all their hard work and give nothing back. They made a pretty interface with many fans but can't take credit for the underlying OS.
You need to do some fact checking. Darwin for instance.
PS: If you don't know how to use it, it doesn't mean a lot of other people can't.





Member since:
2006-05-30
They did not. That honour belongs to the Xerox Star, launched in 1981. See what I mean with people not having a clue about history and just assuming Apple did everything?
"
Did Xerox actually have many commercial sales? As I remember it was a flop. May be "first commercially successful" would be accurate? And this isn't the Mac, this is the Lisa.
When you really break it down, Apple only developed the original Mac OS, "
Wrong. Or is the Mac OS X on my Mac Mini Scotch Mist? The Openstep on my old grey box bears almost no resemblance to Mac OS X 10.0, let alone 10.7. There are a few similarities, but then there are as many to Classic MacOS also. So, you are now belittling the 10+ years Apple worked on OS X?
Yep, indeed Thom.