Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 2nd Aug 2012 21:48 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 529503
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Misleading fluff from Ars Technica..
by zima on Tue 7th Aug 2012 00:33
in reply to "Misleading fluff from Ars Technica.."
If users feel ML is faster, it's more likely due to using more optimized applications (like Safari 6).
Or placebo. It's a trivial trick to our minds, they are very powerful like that.
Why would the effect be confined only to audio tech improvements? Once I made a small experiment on a buddy of mine, who was absolutely certain he can feel a huge speedup after overclocking his CPU - thing is, in a controlled test, he was unable to tell when it was running at full, and when at half speed; his guesses were no better than chance.
(also http://plan9.bell-labs.com/wiki/plan9/Mouse_vs._keyboard/index.html and in another field: http://news-service.stanford.edu/pr/2008/pr-wine-011608.html - a ~"higher version number" changes the way people experience wine)




Member since:
2010-12-08
The title should have been 'Graphics BENCHMARKS give Mountain Lion (_USERS_) that speedy feeling'.
'up to' 10% improvements won't be noticed in regular use. If users feel ML is faster, it's more likely due to using more optimized applications (like Safari 6).
The quality of Ars articles during the holiday season disappoints...