Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 4th Aug 2012 00:54 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 529638
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2012-08-04
That's fine - just don't blame that on me. If you misunderstood what was going on in this case, the proper response is: "Oh, I misunderstood because *I* didn't read the links. Could you elaborate on this please, next time? Thanks!"
You don't do as the original poster did and just launch an all-out attack. "
I wouldn't call the OP's post an all-out attack, though he did seem to relish pointing out flaws a bit too much. For the record, I've been a lurker here for years. I only registered today because I thought the responses you and Morgan posted were dickish and condescending to an extreme. Of all the interesting, enraging and though-provoking things that have been posted over the years, the only thing that drove me to respond was the way you handled an obvious troll. Please keep that in mind.
Only comparing formats, not content. The medium is the message, my friend