To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
X is the least of anyone's problems, its just become the whipping boy of the Linux crowd.
There are serious deficiencies in the Linux Desktop, and KDE frankly does almost nothing to alleviate any of these. The UX is absolutely emarassing and its reached the point where I'm certain they're joking. This can't be something they seriously put out.
Almost every platform, concept, or paradigm they've introduced has been second rate and detrimental to their own progress. Its like they've been jerking the chain of their userbase for half a decade while they try this stupid ass science experiment.
Gnome, ironically, looks like a more sensible approach, just completely without product direction. Its almost tragic.
There are serious deficiencies in the Linux Desktop, and KDE frankly does almost nothing to alleviate any of these. The UX is absolutely emarassing and its reached the point where I'm certain they're joking. This can't be something they seriously put out.
Almost every platform, concept, or paradigm they've introduced has been second rate and detrimental to their own progress. Its like they've been jerking the chain of their userbase for half a decade while they try this stupid ass science experiment.
Gnome, ironically, looks like a more sensible approach, just completely without product direction. Its almost tragic.
Yup.
No the criticism of X is well deserved.
KDE is a poor copy of the Windows interface but it gets the job done. You click on programs to run them, use the taskbar to switch between them, etc. The real problem is that it sits on X.
X still has weird issues with resolution changes, multi-monitors, and worse can leave Granny in a command prompt if there is a video crash.
It also still has problems with font aliasing, video playback, and clipping. It sucks.




Member since:
2012-06-22
KDE wouldn't be so bad if it didn't have to sit on top of X.