Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 4th Aug 2012 04:17 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 529943
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: Were TRS-80 clones legal?
by MOS6510 on Mon 6th Aug 2012 20:20
in reply to "RE[5]: Were TRS-80 clones legal?"
I don't know if at most typing-in some BASIC listings counts as coding...
It's still a lot more code than the average user today types!
And zero documentation was even possibly more often the rule. Or, at best, only a manual written in a totally unknown language - not a good start to "work out" things, that you cherish in the days gone by.
In The Netherlands you got a Dutch manual with your Commodore 64. Hell, even the tape recorder had one!
RE[7]: Were TRS-80 clones legal?
by zima on Mon 6th Aug 2012 22:35
in reply to "RE[6]: Were TRS-80 clones legal?"
> I don't know if at most typing-in some BASIC listings counts as coding...
It's still a lot more code than the average user today types!
It's still a lot more code than the average user today types!
Still not convinced... conceptually, it's not much different from people with post-it notes glued to the monitor or desk - on which there are step-by-step instructions to the most trivial GUI tasks.





Member since:
2005-07-06
I don't know if at most typing-in some BASIC listings counts as coding...
And zero documentation was even possibly more often the rule. Or, at best, only a manual written in a totally unknown language - not a good start to "work out" things, that you cherish in the days gone by.