Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 6th Aug 2012 14:42 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 529946
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
Oh I realize what MSL uses (and others http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Radiation-hardened_microproce... ), the constraints and goals, and that Intel doesn't pursuit them with present designs - thing is, they probably could fairly easily considering their resources, and be quite successful at it (even if only in a decade or two, considering the typical inertia of avionics systems)
Intel does maintain simpler, in-order, sort of Pentium-derived cores - with Atom and Larrabee/MIC architecture.
Anyway, glancing more thoroughly at VxWorks Wiki article in the meantime, I noticed "Native 64-bit operating system[7] (only one 64-bit architecture supported: X86-64)" - so maybe, over time, Intel does plan to make its chips the premium choice for users of that OS (and Intel would probably like the publicity from usage in space missions). Why would Intel buy them out otherwise, anyway?