Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 7th Aug 2012 12:24 UTC, submitted by henderson101
Thread beginning with comment 530134
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Who reads the papers:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DGscoaUWW2M
Yay me!
Put it another way: would you prefer the Times/Telegraph/Guardian or the Sport/Sun/Mirror? We're leaning towards the latter here.
Put it another way: would you prefer the Times/Telegraph/Guardian or the Sport/Sun/Mirror? We're leaning towards the latter here.
The Independent is my paper of choice. The Times isn't that much better than The Mail (from what I recall) and the Guardian is biased too. Never read the Telegraph though.





Member since:
2007-03-26
As a forum member, yes. As somebody supposedly reporting news, no not really. I grew up with the BBC where they bend over backwards to be fair to all parties. Maybe I'm spoilt? I expect journalists to report fairly and where they disagree with something, to give opinion pieces to expose they own feelings.
BBC sensationalise as much as any other news organisation and thus also chase after trendy news items - giving them unfair bias over competitors. eg Apple product launches have always been a feature since the launch of the iPhone, yet no other competitors were featured on even the Technology pages of the news site until only the last 24 months ago.
Furthermore, nearly all of their IT reporters are technologically inept. Rory Cellan-Jones is the prime example; he once went on record slating Linux because he couldn't even manage to install Ubuntu on a bog standard PC and then bitched about how hard it was to use because he tried to compile OpenOffice instead of pulling it from the software repositories.
BBC used to be good back when it pretty much had a monopoly. But in the post satellite / cable TV era they've been spiralling downwards. Worse yet, in the post internet era, the few good articles the Beeb have published have amounted to little more than a copy and paste job from Reuters (but then isn't that basically how all news works these days?)
The ironic thing about all this is, in your campaign for impartial reporting, you've referenced a news organisation that's off it's game but you which you had fond childhood memories of, and have given an unbalanced counterargument regarding the Apple vs Samsung slapping contest. So with all this talk of fair arguments, you've been guilty of the same conviction.