Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 7th Aug 2012 11:15 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 530175
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/13/13 14:35 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/11/13 17:07 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/10/13 23:13 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/08/13 14:57 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/07/13 11:40 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/04/13 12:45 UTC
Linked by nfeske on 05/31/13 10:12 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/29/13 16:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-06-29
What really kills me about two of the Acer laptops I've worked on in the past is their unwillingness to let go of old technology. Both laptops were released in late 2009, yet they still had Vista instead of 7 and the WiFi card was in a mini-PCI, not mini-PCIe slot. Some time during the production of that particular model, they changed the boards to use a mini-PCIe slot instead. Given that the old, outdated PCI cards are twice as expensive as the newer PCIe cards, not to mention that PCIe for laptops has been around since 2005, it makes absolutely no sense to me that they continued to produce such garbage.
On top of that, I also saw a lot of the same build quality issues you mentioned. In fact, one of the laptops I worked on had a dead motherboard within eight months of purchase, and Acer refused to honor their own 1-year warranty. I ended up finding a newer revision board and a matching PCIe WiFi card for less than it would have cost just to ship the unit to their repair center in China if they had been willing to honor the warranty.