Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 7th Aug 2012 12:24 UTC, submitted by henderson101
Legal "Comparing Samsung's flagship products before and after release of the iPhone & iPad, and how Apple's intellectual property infringement claims hold up." A terrible visual guide that ignores not only Samsung's own pre-iPhone designs, but also - and worse yet - the thirty-odd years of mobile computing that preceded the iPhone. Typical of today's technology world: a complete and utter lack of historical sense. Worse yet are the claims about icons: only the phone icon is similar, but Apple did not invent the green phone icon. This is a remnant of virtually all earlier phones which use a green phone icon for initiate/answer call, and a red phone icon for terminate/reject call. Claiming this deserves IP protection is beyond ridiculous, and shows just how low Apple is willing to go.
Thread beginning with comment 530193
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Yeah.
by MysterMask on Wed 8th Aug 2012 04:13 UTC in reply to "Yeah."
MysterMask
Member since:
2005-07-12

these stories keep popping up because Apple continues to behave ..


Come on. Just look around the web and you'll see a lot more patent stories than just "Apple against ..". Funny, only the 'Apple against ..' stories are seen on this site.

Of course it's Thom's freedom to post whatever stories he likes on his tech blog, but claiming that there is some natural objectivity in the selection of stories is just stupid.

In the media world things are not about truth, justice or objectivity but about who can make the most noise.

Reply Parent Score: 0

RE[2]: Yeah.
by darseex on Wed 8th Aug 2012 06:21 in reply to "RE: Yeah."
darseex Member since:
2010-12-06

Apple V. Samsung is the big story right now. It's the only one you'll hear about regularly in the 'mainstream media,' because everyone and their mom owns an iPhone. That does elevate this story somewhat, which makes this a bit of a special case; you'll recall that Thom used to post a shit-ton of IP and patent law stories, but everyone started bitching about it due to the sheer number of articles posted.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[3]: Yeah.
by MysterMask on Wed 8th Aug 2012 21:06 in reply to "RE[2]: Yeah."
MysterMask Member since:
2005-07-12

Apple V. Samsung is the big story right now. It's the only one you'll hear about regularly in the 'mainstream media,' because everyone and their mom owns an iPhone.


And yet you claim that
these stories keep popping up because Apple continues to behave in a manner well-worth the ire of anyone.
Sorry, no. These story keep popping up because Thom is heavily biased. And I don't agree that Apple is wrong trying to protect their right using completely legal actions either. If you don't like that a company goes to court about patents (hello - that's what patents are for - to get legal protection!) then you should cry foul about the law. I don't see why this is Apples fault in the first place. Google, Samsun, Nokie, Kodak, have patents too and they will use them if they believe they have to. Simple as that.

Reply Parent Score: 1