Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 8th Aug 2012 06:23 UTC
Legal "The 2010 report, translated from Korean, goes feature by feature, evaluating how Samsung's phone stacks up against the iPhone. Authored by Samsung's product engineering team, the document evaluates everything from the home screen to the browser to the built in apps on both devices. In each case, it comes up with a recommendation on what Samsung should do going forward and in most cases its answer is simple: Make it work more like the iPhone." Pretty damning. We still need to know a few things: how many of these were actually implemented? How common are these types of comparisons (i.e., does Apple have them)? Are these protected by patents and the like? And, but that's largely irrelevant and mostly of interest to me because I'm a translator myself, who translated the document, and how well has he or she done the job?
Thread beginning with comment 530233
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[9]: Common practice
by MOS6510 on Wed 8th Aug 2012 10:11 UTC in reply to "RE[8]: Common practice"
MOS6510
Member since:
2011-05-12

Attack or defend, first you must have them. If you don't have them you can't do either and someone else can.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[10]: Common practice
by Thom_Holwerda on Wed 8th Aug 2012 10:23 in reply to "RE[9]: Common practice"
Thom_Holwerda Member since:
2005-06-29

You are denying Apple claims they invented the iPhone and all that comes with it - including the frivolous bullshit. I point to Apple's patent filings that speak otherwise.

You then move on to claiming, hey, they filed the patents to prevent others from getting it. I then point out to you that Apple is offensively suing everybody left and right, and that Jobd boasted about the patents - which directly contradicts your assessment.

Your final comment now is essentially meaningless to this discussion, so can I assume you agree with me that Apple (1) Apple does indeed claim they invented the iPhone+stuff, and (2) that Apple filed the patents for offensive purposes?

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[11]: Common practice
by MOS6510 on Wed 8th Aug 2012 10:25 in reply to "RE[10]: Common practice"
MOS6510 Member since:
2011-05-12

I stay by my words and won't continue this since you've decided to become rude and disrespectful.

Reply Parent Score: 2