Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 8th Aug 2012 06:23 UTC
Legal "The 2010 report, translated from Korean, goes feature by feature, evaluating how Samsung's phone stacks up against the iPhone. Authored by Samsung's product engineering team, the document evaluates everything from the home screen to the browser to the built in apps on both devices. In each case, it comes up with a recommendation on what Samsung should do going forward and in most cases its answer is simple: Make it work more like the iPhone." Pretty damning. We still need to know a few things: how many of these were actually implemented? How common are these types of comparisons (i.e., does Apple have them)? Are these protected by patents and the like? And, but that's largely irrelevant and mostly of interest to me because I'm a translator myself, who translated the document, and how well has he or she done the job?
Thread beginning with comment 530240
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: Common practice
by MOS6510 on Wed 8th Aug 2012 10:29 UTC in reply to "RE[4]: Common practice"
MOS6510
Member since:
2011-05-12

So by your logic you didn't write this, in fact you do not exist at all

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[6]: Common practice
by Thom_Holwerda on Wed 8th Aug 2012 10:56 in reply to "RE[5]: Common practice"
Thom_Holwerda Member since:
2005-06-29

So by your logic you didn't write this, in fact you do not exist at all


I wrote the comment. I did not invent the words, the grammar, and punctuation that make up the comment. I should not be able to patent these parts just because I put them together in this comment.

Edited 2012-08-08 10:57 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 3