Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 8th Aug 2012 06:23 UTC
Legal "The 2010 report, translated from Korean, goes feature by feature, evaluating how Samsung's phone stacks up against the iPhone. Authored by Samsung's product engineering team, the document evaluates everything from the home screen to the browser to the built in apps on both devices. In each case, it comes up with a recommendation on what Samsung should do going forward and in most cases its answer is simple: Make it work more like the iPhone." Pretty damning. We still need to know a few things: how many of these were actually implemented? How common are these types of comparisons (i.e., does Apple have them)? Are these protected by patents and the like? And, but that's largely irrelevant and mostly of interest to me because I'm a translator myself, who translated the document, and how well has he or she done the job?
Thread beginning with comment 530289
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[7]: Common practice
by bryanv on Wed 8th Aug 2012 13:46 UTC in reply to "RE[6]: Common practice"
Member since:

Careful there...

Apple did by FingerWorks...

So it's legit that they may claim patents on touch-input.

Let me rephrase that, it's legit that they may claim to own patents that probably ought to be considered illegitimate -- since they probably shouldn't exist.

Reply Parent Score: 2