
"Over the past couple weeks, we've read a number of bedtimes stories about RIM's next move. They all start with the same trope: once upon a time, late last century, Apple was on the edge of the precipice and still managed to come back - and how! Today, RIM's situation isn't nearly as dire as Apple's was then. Unlike Apple, it doesn’t need a cash transfusion and, in the words of Thorsten Heins, RIM's new CEO: 'If you look at the platform it's still growing, if you look at the devices we've got a single phone that's sold 45 million units.' RIM will pull off an Apple-like rebound and live happily ever after. Equating RIM 2012 with Apple 1997 is, in so many respects, delusional.
Let me count the ways."
Member since:
2011-01-14
Eh? Am I missing something here? In my country anyway, manufacturers have nothing to do with the data plans - they don't sell them, they don't design them. RIM phones use the carrier provided data plans just like any other phone here anyway...
That's down to opinion really. Having only recently switched from a keypad phone to a touchscreen phone, I can say I desperately miss the keys. If it weren't for how otherwise wonderful the N9 is to use, I'd have switched back to my E52 already.
Hmmm, maybe. I've always found it to me more "modern" than Symbian for example. Not as shiny and silky as iOS & Android, but certainly very capable, and closer to the money than you seem to think. Definitely not OS9 levels of catching up to do!
Prehistoric? Overdramatic much? It's not cutting edge, but I've found them quite reasonable for doing the average smartphone stuff - nice screens and fast enough CPUs for web browsing and viewing office documents for example. Again, they're not cutting edge, but current enough to be usable.