Linked by rohan_p on Wed 8th Aug 2012 15:21 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 530354
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Just exactly what does Haiku or BeOS do better than Linux? My question is as genuine as it is rhetorical.
That's easy. Two things...
Uncompromising responsiveness. It is a heavily threaded, tightly scheduled, single user OS with a UI that is designed to respond with absolute minimal latency, even when heavily taxed.
Simplicity. When you start digging into the guts of the file system and peel back the initial layers of the OS you find... Nothing. There are few if any layered abstractions. The same goes for the API, the number of moving parts is quite small.
Is either of these things the most important attributes of an OS? Not really, but that is kind of the point. The priorities of BeOS/Haiku are and have always been different from most other Operating Systems.
On the other hand, Haiku still has to improve a lot in terms of security.
Currently it has a security model similar to what Amiga, Atari ST, Windows 9x had. We all know what that meant in terms of virus and getting your data secure.
If the an application gets owned, it will have access to the complete filesystem.
This is very important issue to fix, even on a single user desktop OS.





Member since:
2005-11-14
Just exactly what does Haiku or BeOS do better than Linux? My question is as genuine as it is rhetorical.