Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 8th Aug 2012 22:29 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 530385
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Build it, and they will come - to a dead end.
by Delgarde on Thu 9th Aug 2012 01:51
in reply to "RE: Build it, and they will come - to a dead end."
Someone needs to fork gnome2
It's been done, it's called MATE, and to be honest, it's a joke. If you don't like the Gnome 3 UI, the answer isn't to fork Gnome 2 - it's to fork Gnome 3 to restore the old UI.
Remember, Gnome 3 isn't just a UI change - it's also a huge cleanup of the codebase, throwing away all the bad API decisions that they'd been forced to live with for years. If you fork Gnome 2, you've got to adopt all of the code they're not maintaining any more. Bad idea.
RE[3]: Build it, and they will come - to a dead end.
by 1c3d0g on Thu 9th Aug 2012 06:20
in reply to "RE[2]: Build it, and they will come - to a dead end."
They've already forked GNOME 3, FYI, and it's called Cinnamon. MUCH more usable than anything coming out of GNOME these days.
http://cinnamon.linuxmint.com/
RE[3]: Build it, and they will come - to a dead end.
by Gullible Jones on Thu 9th Aug 2012 15:31
in reply to "RE[2]: Build it, and they will come - to a dead end."





Member since:
2010-05-06
After turning in the wrong direction, continuing 'ahead', much less accelerating will only get you farther from the goal.
Someone needs to fork gnome2, or perhaps just work with xfce.