Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 7th Aug 2012 12:24 UTC, submitted by henderson101
Legal "Comparing Samsung's flagship products before and after release of the iPhone & iPad, and how Apple's intellectual property infringement claims hold up." A terrible visual guide that ignores not only Samsung's own pre-iPhone designs, but also - and worse yet - the thirty-odd years of mobile computing that preceded the iPhone. Typical of today's technology world: a complete and utter lack of historical sense. Worse yet are the claims about icons: only the phone icon is similar, but Apple did not invent the green phone icon. This is a remnant of virtually all earlier phones which use a green phone icon for initiate/answer call, and a red phone icon for terminate/reject call. Claiming this deserves IP protection is beyond ridiculous, and shows just how low Apple is willing to go.
Thread beginning with comment 530463
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: Pre-designs?
by BushLin on Thu 9th Aug 2012 16:13 UTC in reply to "RE[4]: Pre-designs?"
BushLin
Member since:
2011-01-26

If I had evidence that you had several profiles, voting your own comments up seconds after you posted would it become invalid if I mention this just before comments close for this story?

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[6]: Pre-designs?
by henderson101 on Fri 10th Aug 2012 12:06 in reply to "RE[5]: Pre-designs?"
henderson101 Member since:
2006-05-30

But that would be pointless. You could only up vote a couple of times per comment. You'd need hundreds of accounts to make it work for more than a day.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[7]: Pre-designs?
by BushLin on Fri 10th Aug 2012 12:12 in reply to "RE[6]: Pre-designs?"
BushLin Member since:
2011-01-26

Given the consistency of the immediate vote ups on your posts you clearly don't consider it pointless. I call shinanigans!

Reply Parent Score: 1