Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 9th Aug 2012 13:12 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 530485
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
A tablet is not a general purpose device.
Only because some vendors want to prevent this. There is no logical reason for it not to be a general purpose device. Small form factor of the computer should not detract from the general purpose of its computing capabilities. Therefore people should be opposed to the restriction notion.
See also "War on general purpose computing" as a good review of this issue (which explains why vendors would want to change the perception of computers to appliances):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HUEvRyemKSg
Apple are notorious in their notions of locking things up and thwarting interoperability, so bringing them as an example only strengthens the point above about bad practices of manufacturers.
Edited 2012-08-09 20:29 UTC





Member since:
2010-06-08
Tablet computer is not an appliance. It's a mulitpurpose universal computer device. Therefore your example is irrelevant.
While the notion of many vendors to turn computers into appliances is known (that logic helps them to lock them up), users should resist such kind of logic as much as possible, especially when it comes to real multipurpose devices.