Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 8th Aug 2012 22:29 UTC
Gnome The future of GNOME - an interesting subject. GNOME 3 has been out and about for a while, and it hasn't exactly been a smashing success. One of the efforts to take GNOME to the next level is what the team refers to as GNOME OS - but in reality, it's a set of improvements to GNOME that are just as interesting to GNOME-the-desktop-environment.
E-mail Print r 7   · Read More · 74 Comment(s)
Thread beginning with comment 530577
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Gullible Jones
Member since:

No, why would anyone? The P2 is a 15 year old CPU, it's not reasonable to expect today's desktop OS to work well, or even at all, on it.

Why is it not reasonable? As far as I can tell, the only things that have significantly changed about normal desktop functionality are
a) what's expected of multimedia applications
b) what's expected of browsers
c) what applications are expected to look like

Multimedia is optional (or doesn't have to be high definition). Eyecandy should be possible to turn off. The only really significant one IMO is browsing, thanks to all the JS-intensive websites out there.

Word processing? Printing? Rendering plain old HTML? How has that stuff changed? (Other than better language support, which even ancient machines have quite enough memory for.)

I don't think that's a conclusion you can come to based on the usability on a P2.
Today's programmers code for today's computers, not for 15 year old tech. That's how it has always been.

Point taken, but I'm not entirely sure this is a good state of affairs. The rapid "progress" of computer technology is currently driving an environmental and humanitarian catastrophe.

I'm not sure running 15 year old technology is more environmentally friendly.

Not in terms of power usage, but as I understand it it's more friendly in terms of avoiding general pollution, due to how PCs are recycled. I could be wrong though.

Reply Parent Score: 4