Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 9th Aug 2012 21:38 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 530580
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Yes... but on the front page is also:
"Microsoft not being allowed to use the Metro name here is just as ridiculous as Apple trolling Samsung."
If Samsung indeed copied the iPhone, like Apple claims and their own document kind of proves, how can Apple's actions still be described as ridiculous and trolling?





Member since:
2009-08-22
Thom - whilst on the subject of Apple's legal battle with Samsung (you brought this up not I) any chance of clarifying your position on the leaked Samsung document covered by this OS News item:
http://www.osnews.com/comments/26256
In the comment thread of that debate you mentioned a couple of times the possibility of the translation being wrong, a bit odd as Samsung itself had never raised that defence, and I am now assuming that you accept the validity of the translation.
Accepting the accuracy of the translation of the Samsung document at face value for the sake of debate - what is your view on the contents of this document?
Does the Samsung approach to product design it reveals appear acceptable to you and how in your opinion does such an approach enhance innovation in the tech industry?