Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 9th Aug 2012 21:38 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 530596
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
You can't just use a trademark belonging to one of your important partners and forget to ask them if that's ok.
It is one word in the dictionary. Did MS try to trademark it? If not why can't they use that word to refer to something? If MS would have called it awesome would you think it fair they would trademark the word awesome?
Edited 2012-08-10 20:51 UTC
RE[2]: Not so ridiculous
by ins0mniac on Fri 10th Aug 2012 20:58
in reply to "RE: Not so ridiculous"
> You can't just use a trademark belonging to one of your important partners and forget to ask them if that's ok.
It is one word in the dictionary. Did MS try to trademark it? If not why can't they use that word to refer to something?
It is one word in the dictionary. Did MS try to trademark it? If not why can't they use that word to refer to something?
So you really don't get what parent poster wrote, or how the world works in general... it's about MS pleasing their important partner, one of the largest retailers of Windows PCs in several of more affluent markets, to be on as good terms with them as possible.
Edited 2012-08-17 00:03 UTC





Member since:
2008-10-01
Metro AG owns the trademark for Metro. It's theirs and they don't want anybody else to use it, that's the point of trademarks, isn't it? And I do think they are entirely appropriate to consider that there would be confusion. Try explaining to a small shop owner that uses Metro AG as his supplier that the new computer/tablet/phone that he just bought has nothing to do with Metro AG, but rather with the typical american ignorance of the obscure place called 'the rest of the world'.
You can't just use a trademark belonging to one of your important partners and forget to ask them if that's ok.