Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 9th Aug 2012 21:38 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 530633
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Without getting in to the same tired arguments on another unrelated story -Thom has already drawn the battle lines and admitted that he can't be objective. It's sad, but until he appoints a new Apple/Samsung news reported with a neutral perspective, you'll get this slanted view. I state again - neither party is clean, they are both corrupt, neither deserve to win.....




Member since:
2011-05-12
Well, in a way Thom asked correct questions.
However when Apple appears to be in the wrong, even when it's a suggested rumor with no merit but someone's imagination, he condemns Apple without any reserve, doubt or question. A few times already he got it wrong, but never did he publish a correction.
When it's Samsung, one of the good guys, everything is doubted and questioned. Even the translator is under suspicion.
We now know what happens after the verdict. If Apple wins the system is evil, the judge a fool and the jury a bunch bribed idiots. If Samsung wins the judge 'n' jury are sensible people.