Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 7th Aug 2012 11:15 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 530645
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.



Member since:
2005-07-06
Last time there was a really big effort by hardware manufacturers to shake the Microsoft shackles was when Asus released their early netbooks with a Linux OS.
They saw a way to produce dirt cheap computers with low cost hardware and zero cost OS, and they took it.
Microsoft countered by picking their WinXP master copy out of the trash and giving it to the netbook makers for virtually zero cost [...]
The netbooks quite underpowered, and even an old OS like XP didn't work that well for them.
The OS wasn't zero cost to Asus, Xandros was definately getting something out of it. And in return for a quite poor Linux variant, which definitely worked worse than XP.
But, somewhere in there, you nearly said that - yes - it was most likely again just another way to get better deals out of MS. That was what Asus saw.
Nonsense. IE6 is virtually unused for quite some time by general population - which you would realize if you'd just look, once in a while, at general web browsing stats.
IE6 did hold out much longer in corporate settings who don't bother to upgrade, but that's separate from MS ...hell, Microsoft would probably love if corps upgraded earlier (instead of sitting on XP and its default browser for so long, many of them just now upgrading to 7)