Linked by nej_simon on Sat 11th Aug 2012 12:10 UTC
Legal "[...] tonight Apple entered into evidence in its trial with Samsung a document showing that it offered the South Korean company a licensing deal on some of its key technologies. Specifically, Apple offered to license the portfolio of patents if Samsung would pay $30 per smartphone and $40 per tablet." $30-40 per device is a lot of money for some trivial features (rounded corners, slide-to-unlock etc). No wonder Samsung declined.
Thread beginning with comment 530667
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
by Luke McCarthy on Sat 11th Aug 2012 13:29 UTC
Luke McCarthy
Member since:

That is incredibly greedy, considering the ARM licence is only a few cents per device.

Reply Score: 6

v RE: Greedy
by Tony Swash on Sat 11th Aug 2012 16:13 in reply to "Greedy"
RE[2]: Greedy
by ephracis on Sat 11th Aug 2012 16:20 in reply to "RE: Greedy"
ephracis Member since:

Why compare profit to revenue? You surely don't need to use such dirty tricks to make your point.

Reply Parent Score: 4

RE[2]: Greedy
by tupp on Sat 11th Aug 2012 17:02 in reply to "RE: Greedy"
tupp Member since:

It's always fun to hear the fanboys' interpretation of Apple's desires/motives.

Apple's motives fro pursuing this action have always been absolutely clear. To stop Samsung from copying Apple designs

But the designs are not Apple's -- the designs did not originate at Apple.

Reply Parent Score: 12

RE[2]: Greedy
by Bill Shooter of Bul on Sun 12th Aug 2012 19:23 in reply to "RE: Greedy"
Bill Shooter of Bul Member since:

No, genius, it is all about money. Why doesn't Apple want samsung to copy it? M-O-N-E-Y. With large cooperations, its always about money.

Reply Parent Score: 2