To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
30$ per device that could translate into billions of $ in the case of samsung. Even Microsoft is not that greedy with only a 16$/device licence for long file name over FAT.
Plus it applied on windows mobile based phone (I guess that it could not be applied to other OS in these terms) and applied a discount of 20% if samsung cross licence some of its patent ( which I guess that samsung though that they were worthing more than 6-8$ per device ).
Apple only went after WP7 as an inclusive means of leverage, and it discounted them all the way to $6 a device.
Would Samsung offer purely WP7 devices, Apple wouldn't have the gall to demand such a thing, especially not with the cross licensing agreements Samsung and Microsoft entered.
Adurbe pondered...
It probably not to late to retrain as a patent lawyer!!!!
Maybe you should just practice your math a bit first and see how many millions it comes out to when you factor in $30 dollars per phone and $40 per tablet? Then subtract the estimated numbers from people who would chose not to buy the devices at the newly inflated prices...
I imagine the numbers would be interesting.
--bornagainpenguin




Member since:
2005-07-06
Interesting how companies will avoid paying $30 dollars for a license yet will happily pay the millions in legal fees in avoiding them...
It probably not to late to retrain as a patent lawyer!!!!