Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 11th Aug 2012 14:31 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 530816
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
And possibly something like 80% experiences the inherent flaws of that approach ...seriously, not only it offers just a bit more cues than "2D" (that's a deceptive misnomer, normal TV does have most of spacial cues our minds use), it gets those additional ones very wrong (notably, the parallax is completely ...well, wrong; and overall, few aspects which are very linked IRL, are decoupled here).
"They" are trying to sell this fad every few decades... (stereography is not much younger than photography)





Member since:
2007-01-13
By age 45 most of us would be unable to tell the difference between a Retina display and 640x480 display without wearing spectacles.