Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 12th Aug 2012 21:15 UTC, submitted by Torbjorn Vik Lunde
Thread beginning with comment 530913
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Comment by Nelson
by allanregistos on Mon 13th Aug 2012 23:29
in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by Nelson"
Then perhaps you can enlighten us how the law works?
Unfortunately, I am not a lawyer, so can't comment on your next question. It is a given that the U.S. patent law is broken, that is the point. If it is, then it need to be fixed.
In particular why samsung realistically can't use this example of prior art to invalidate Apple's patent on inertial scrolling.




Member since:
2011-02-11
Then perhaps you can enlighten us how the law works?
In particular why samsung realistically can't use this example of prior art to invalidate Apple's patent on inertial scrolling.