Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 10th Aug 2012 16:06 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Thread beginning with comment 530925
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: Gosh I used to like QNX
by zima on Fri 17th Aug 2012 23:52
in reply to "RE[5]: Gosh I used to like QNX"
Well, it's also the fault of the company that basically takes any name they like, cleans up only after the fact (like it was also with the iPhone IIRC)
And I imagine that, for codebase of such importance (used not only in a fairly crucial line of ~switches, also automotive usage or with... Canadian nuclear reactors), buying of QNX per se wouldn't even be required - the code is certainly in escrow, with arrangements made a long time ago for ownership transfer, were something to happen with its parent company.




Member since:
2008-08-27
edit: Ah, IOS and not iOS. Automatic mental typo filtering isn't always a good thing.
Which makes it a good point: In the worst case, cisco will probably buy QNX just to keep it going. Not the best of fates, but probably better than outright dying.
Edited 2012-08-13 10:37 UTC