Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 13th Aug 2012 00:20 UTC, submitted by Markus Su
Thread beginning with comment 530964
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: "Firefox OS is a huge and scary step"? No surprise!
by renox on Tue 14th Aug 2012 09:07
in reply to "RE[3]: "Firefox OS is a huge and scary step"? No surprise!"
Strange I don't think there's much wrong with Firefox. Stable, pretty fast, has the best addons, and served from an impartial vendor - what more could you ask for?
Improved security from one process per website? Chrome is the benchmark for security.. And for "pretty fast" I disagree: Chrome is much more responsive..
But I agree very much with the rest, especially with the "best addons": there's nothing equivalent to "tree style tabs" on Chrome..
RE[5]: "Firefox OS is a huge and scary step"? No surprise!
by Spiron on Tue 14th Aug 2012 09:33
in reply to "RE[4]: "Firefox OS is a huge and scary step"? No surprise!"
RE[5]: "Firefox OS is a huge and scary step"? No surprise!
by wonea on Tue 14th Aug 2012 12:37
in reply to "RE[4]: "Firefox OS is a huge and scary step"? No surprise!"
Although I think one process per website is a great idea, I've found Chrome tends to eat a lot memory in doing so. Personally Firefox is good enough. I used Chrome for a couple of years before moving back to Firefox, I don't anything that will make me want to switch again.
As a side note my main problem I'm having is Flash instability. Honestly if it wasn't for YouTube I would have uninstalled it long ago.





Member since:
2005-10-28
Strange I don't think there's much wrong with Firefox. Stable, pretty fast, has the best addons, and served from an impartial vendor - what more could you ask for?