To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
There are concrete arguments why customers select Android over iPhone. Customers are aware that there are differences and there choice is cause of those differences.
That invalidates the whole "Samsung clones iPhone design to offer a cheaper iphone copycat what gives them a competative advantage" argumentation. Design is clearly NOT the reason, it doesn't even appear in the list, why customers pick Samsung Android rather then iPhone devices.
As consequences even if Samsung does copy Apple's design (what is not the case and may it be only cause Apple did copy it themself from others) its not a strong selling argument and hence even if Samsung needs to pay compenstation it needs to be way below what Apple asks for.
Edited 2012-08-16 05:15 UTC




Member since:
2006-06-01
And just how is all of this relevant in a copyright case? I don't get it.