Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 20th Aug 2012 22:14 UTC
Legal "The web has been alight these past few weeks with the details of the Apple v. Samsung lawsuit. It's been a unique opportunity to peer behind the curtain of how these two companies operate, as the trial seeks to answer the question: did Samsung copy Apple? But there's actually another question that I think is much more interesting to the future of innovation in the technology industry: regardless of whether the courts say that Samsung copied Apple or not, would we all be better off if we allowed - even encouraged - companies to copy one another?" This is very relevant.
Thread beginning with comment 531677
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Ridiculous
by tylerdurden on Tue 21st Aug 2012 18:28 UTC in reply to "RE: Ridiculous"
tylerdurden
Member since:
2009-03-17

That is a ridiculously subjective assessment.

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[3]: Ridiculous
by satsujinka on Wed 22nd Aug 2012 04:26 in reply to "RE[2]: Ridiculous"
satsujinka Member since:
2010-03-11

Because "innovative" is ridiculously subjective. In fact, I'd be willing to bet that the impression that something is "innovative" is inversely correlated with knowledge in that particular field.

Reply Parent Score: 2