Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 22nd Aug 2012 07:50 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 531755
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Comment by MOS6510
by MOS6510 on Wed 22nd Aug 2012 11:15
in reply to "RE: Comment by MOS6510"
I'm no legal person, but my feeling says if you do a trail by jury you want to know what the ordinary person thinks about it without any knowledge about law and little letters.
All these pages, questions and having to talk it over with 8 other people is more suited for professionals.
The jury verdict is in a way directed/dictated by these forms. They can't say what they like, they must try to approach their opinion within the boundaries set in the papers.
The judge and lawyers are professionals, the witnesses experts in their fields and who makes the decision? Some locally rounded up citizens, selected on the basis that they didn't know about what was going on between Apple and Samsung making them the ignorant kind of types!




Member since:
2012-08-01
Considering the amount of data they have to go over, it makes me wonder if this is the kind of thing that should be settled by a few randomly chosen people with little or no qualification for the trial in question.
I wonder if they get some kind of diploma after this. Honestly, they should, you don't read and debate over 700 points in 109/32 pages on that subject without getting some very solid understanding about it.