Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 24th Aug 2012 23:54 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 532077
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2010-02-01
Seriously.... Apple didn't create those software designs. In the end, a person, or a team of people. That is the source of the patent and if it's a good enough design then it deserves a patent and it deserves protection.
This means other people, and companies will now have to think of something different. Msomething original. I can't for the life of me imagine how that could be a bad thing for consumers or the industry as a whole.
If some likes the design and wants to make billions from it too, then you license it. Simple logic, IMO.
Edited 2012-08-25 01:25 UTC