Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 24th Aug 2012 23:54 UTC
Legal And just like that, within a matter of days, the jury has reached a verdict in Apple vs. Samsung. The basic gist is simple: Apple's software patents are valid, and many Samsung devices infringe upon them. Apple's iPhone 3G trade dress is valid, and Samsung's Galaxy S line infringes, but other devices did not. Samsung did not infringe Apple's iPad design patent. Apple did not infringe any of Samsung's patents. Apple is awarded a little over $1 billion in damages. Competition lost today, and developers in the United States should really start to get worried - software patents got validated big time today.
Thread beginning with comment 532077
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Why is this so bad?
by chrisale on Sat 25th Aug 2012 01:20 UTC
chrisale
Member since:
2010-02-01

Seriously.... Apple didn't create those software designs. In the end, a person, or a team of people. That is the source of the patent and if it's a good enough design then it deserves a patent and it deserves protection.

This means other people, and companies will now have to think of something different. Msomething original. I can't for the life of me imagine how that could be a bad thing for consumers or the industry as a whole.

If some likes the design and wants to make billions from it too, then you license it. Simple logic, IMO.

Edited 2012-08-25 01:25 UTC

Reply Score: 0