Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 24th Aug 2012 23:54 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 532085
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/20/13 6:17 UTC, submitted by MOS6510
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 23:02 UTC, submitted by M.Onty
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/19/13 22:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Anonymous on 06/18/13 22:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 22:25 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/18/13 17:32 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:58 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 06/17/13 17:52 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2008-07-15
The instant you bring a typical American jury in on a matter like this, it becomes a public recognition war as opposed to an unbiased legal judgement. In this country, no matter how much one rails against it, Apple are a very strong brand if not the strongest at the moment. Apple didn't buy any of the courts, for the simple reason that they didn't need to. The thing to remember about most of our jurors is this: They were so stupid they couldn't even figure out a way to get out of jury duty. Bring people like that in, actively remove those with any tech knowledge, and the only thing surprising about this verdict is how quickly it was reached. Even I, a cynic if ever there was one, expected to take at least a week.
Of course, it's far from over. I doubt Samsung is just going to walk away. The pointless saga continues. Excuse me while I go get myself some popcorn and an ice cold beer.