Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 25th Aug 2012 06:07 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 532258
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Comment by Stephen!
by Yagami on Sun 26th Aug 2012 09:34
in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by Stephen!"
its funny because there were "xAPP" (X apps ) , "gAPP" (Gnome Apps) , "kAPP" (KDE Apps) ...
but being linux, using the same prefix for its products is geek and stupid.
Of course if apple does it, its cool and innovative !
Seriously ... can't we do anything about this?! I am not American, and I actually find my phone charges nice ( 15€ and i have free call's, sms and 600MB internet month ), but Its disgusting to read about this. And then read U.S.A Citizens complain about phone charges.
RE[3]: Comment by Stephen!
by zima on Tue 28th Aug 2012 02:50
in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by Stephen!"




Member since:
2006-11-12
It never ceases to amaze that Apple fanboys actually believe such ridiculous notions.
No. Apple was not the first with "iNames" -- not by a longshot. Here is the Lowel i-Light, whose small "i" name was trademarked in 1985 (around 15 years before the first Apple "iProduct": http://lowel.com/ilight/