Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 24th Aug 2012 23:54 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 532282
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[8]: spreading FUD because you failed in judgement?
by kyousefi on Mon 27th Aug 2012 18:01
in reply to "RE[7]: spreading FUD because you failed in judgement?"
They are not claiming on the entire category. The proof is they don't have and didn't have the same problem with windows phone, touch screen black berries and palm's web OS. They have the problem with the samsung copying their trade dress. Trade dress has nothing to do with technology or freedom of innovation. Trade dress is Casio makes some watch similar to Rolex submariner. In any other trade the winner in court is obvious. OS news is muddying the water by framing this legal battle as a battle of copying technology. It's a war on copying the looks. And looks are important, profitable, and can be stolen.




Member since:
2006-01-25
I completely agree with that statement. Do you not understand that it completely invalidates everything else your wrote...
Apple DID achieve market success first with this "class" of product (ie. multi-touch tablet/smart phone). It certainly matters because their headstart paid off in spades, their sales show it... That first to market advantage paid off enormously for them.
Seriously, I respect their ability to make good products. I have some of them. Good for Apple! I'm glad they made a fortune - they deserve it.
Now why the f*ck should that preclude other companies from making similar products and trying to compete with them??? Apple already got the benefits of their advantage - and then some. How does giving them an unfettered monopoly on an entire category of product benefit anyone other than Apple?