Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 25th Aug 2012 18:38 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 532342
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Comment by broken_symlink
by some1 on Sun 26th Aug 2012 04:38
in reply to "Comment by broken_symlink"
RE[2]: Comment by broken_symlink
by broken_symlink on Sun 26th Aug 2012 12:16
in reply to "RE: Comment by broken_symlink"





Member since:
2005-07-06
I thought about this some more, and the one good thing that MIGHT come of this, is that maybe Android hardware manufacturers might decide to just use android as is, instead of putting things like Sense, Touchwiz, and Blur (although I guess this last one probably doesn't matter that much anymore) on it. Wouldn't that then shift liability from hardware manufacturers to Google?
Google should offer indemnification incentives for companies that use AOSP as is, and in return these companies should put their patents in a pool. That would solve Android fragmentation problems, and could create a single united front against MS, Apple, and anyone else who tries to sue over Android.
The only possible problem would be if hardware manufacturers tried to sue each other over Android, such as HTC suing Samsung, but maybe Google could mediate in those cases?