To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
In the article you cite these historic facts that no one seems to be disputing. I for one I don't dispute them. I have a few Palms, MessagePads, PocketPCs, Psions and others. Palm and Handspring devices were in fact very popular with Apple users.
But you always make it sound the world is mad and the iPhone is some rebranded Palm Pilot.
If was up to me Palm would still be in business.
I think the people that say the iPhone wasn't a milestone are as dumb as the Apple brainwashed fans that pretend Apple invented everything.
The iPhone was a wake-up call for the whole phone industry. They took some existing ideas, invented/refined some others and they polished it in a way that nobody ever did before. That's Apple's strength: they polish their products so that what was a niche product ends up being useful for the masses.
Now, the somewhat political question that this whole trial raise is : should a company have a legal way to block its concurrent from copying them or is the fact that they will be first to market a big enough advantage in itself ?





Member since:
2005-06-29
Point me to where I claim it is NOT a milestone. Please. Do so.
Of course the iPhone is a milestone - it had a huge impact. However, it's not a milestone because it did anything new or for the first time; it did things better. And rightfully so Apple got rewarded for it.
I've said so in countless articles. You appear to be putting words into my mouth because you have no way to address the actual article at hand.