Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 26th Aug 2012 10:28 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 532468
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: How easy it is to forget...
by Thom_Holwerda on Sun 26th Aug 2012 18:40
in reply to "RE[5]: How easy it is to forget..."
RE[7]: How easy it is to forget...
by jared_wilkes on Sun 26th Aug 2012 18:49
in reply to "RE[6]: How easy it is to forget..."
RE[6]: How easy it is to forget...
by some1 on Sun 26th Aug 2012 19:20
in reply to "RE[5]: How easy it is to forget..."
It didn't have to be the opinion of a lawyer, judge, or jury to be admissible as evidence that Samsung was aware they could be using Apple IP
Right, this is admissible as an evidence that there was a possibility of a violation. This is not the smoking gun as many make it to be.
You are trying to make arguments you hope are valid and apply them to the US legal system.
You're putting words in my mouth and hope no one will notice.
Apple shows what Samsung shows in 80% of the advertising, product packaging, and other marketing materials.
Some proof, please.
The app drawer designed to look like Apple's homescreen.
Citation needed.





Member since:
2011-04-25
So what? It didn't have to be the opinion of a lawyer, judge, or jury to be admissible as evidence that Samsung was aware they could be using Apple IP and should avoid doing so. You are trying to make arguments you hope are valid and apply them to the US legal system. Are you claiming there is no such thing as admissible evidence that doesn't originate as "legal advice"? That does sound silly, doesn't it?
Apple shows what Samsung shows in 80% of the advertising, product packaging, and other marketing materials. The app drawer designed to look like Apple's homescreen.